Good morning,Just got my mtdna results back, don’t understand most of but my
female line is group A which is pre-Columbian, they take it back
30,000 years… guess we’ve been here a while! The A group extends
down into South America so our female Indio ancestor was native
born… Our male ancestors may have been from Spain but they
married Native American women along the line.This test does not show any of the women from our male lines, just
female to female so it doesn’t prove our Espanol or Mulato blood but
the records prove that, so …I’m happy just having a more complete
picture of our family tree. My proven female line is from Jalisco
Mexico.Has anyone else in this group done the mtdna?
Linda from Wa.
HVR1 Haplogroup
AHVR1 differences
from CRS
16111T16223T
16290T
16319A
16335G
16362C
16526A
Linda,My mtDNA test came also haplogroup A. My maternal great-grandmother
was from the Jalisco area.Compare our numbers and see that we match on four markers. Not very
close, but it means we share a common female mother thousands of years
ago:Mine ----Yours
16075C > ------
16111T > ------
16223T > 16223T
16239T > ------
16290T > 16290T
16319A > 16319A
------ > 16335G
16362C > 16362C
------ > 16526ASaludos
Victor— In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long"
<longsjourney@y…> wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Just got my mtdna results back, don’t understand most of but my
> female line is group A which is pre-Columbian, they take it back
> 30,000 years… guess we’ve been here a while! The A group extends
> down into South America so our female Indio ancestor was native
> born… Our male ancestors may have been from Spain but they
> married Native American women along the line.
>
> This test does not show any of the women from our male lines, just
> female to female so it doesn’t prove our Espanol or Mulato blood but
> the records prove that, so …I’m happy just having a more complete
> picture of our family tree. My proven female line is from Jalisco
> Mexico.
>
> Has anyone else in this group done the mtdna?
>
> Linda from Wa.
>
> HVR1 Haplogroup
> A
>
> HVR1 differences
>
> from CRS
> 16111T
>
> 16223T
>
> 16290T
>
> 16319A
>
> 16335G
>
> 16362C
>
> 16526A
Erlinda,May I ask what company you used for your test and how you went about
researching the prices, services, etc.?— In ranchos@yahoogroups.com, "Erlinda Castanon-Long"
<longsjourney@y…> wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Just got my mtdna results back, don’t understand most of but my
> female line is group A which is pre-Columbian, they take it back
> 30,000 years… guess we’ve been here a while! The A group extends
> down into South America so our female Indio ancestor was native
> born… Our male ancestors may have been from Spain but they
> married Native American women along the line.
>
> This test does not show any of the women from our male lines, just
> female to female so it doesn’t prove our Espanol or Mulato blood
but
> the records prove that, so …I’m happy just having a more complete
> picture of our family tree. My proven female line is from Jalisco
> Mexico.
>
> Has anyone else in this group done the mtdna?
>
> Linda from Wa.
>
> HVR1 Haplogroup
> A
>
> HVR1 differences
>
> from CRS
> 16111T
>
> 16223T
>
> 16290T
>
> 16319A
>
> 16335G
>
> 16362C
>
> 16526A